Category: Case Summaries

This is main Category for Case Summaries.

Gator Boring & Trenching Westra Construction Corp.

Although appellate court did not have jurisdiction to consider appeal of a partial summary judgment dismissing a subcontractor’s lien on basis it was fraudulent as there was a count pending between the parties, it treated the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and granted the writ because the subcontractor would be without a remedy if it had to wait to appeal a final judgment and the co-defendant surety company in the interim were released from its obligation under the surety bond.  Gator Boring & Trenching, Inc. v. Westra Construction Corp., 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2269 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 5, 2016).

Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County

Trial court erred by entering a final summary judgment of dismissal of challenge to city’s ordinances concerning the operation, rental and insurance of motorcycles and mopeds “because the “local governments’ ability to legislate in this area has been preempted by Florida law [Chapter 316].”  Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2201 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 28, 2016).

Anderson v. Epstein

Trial court erred in dismissing a condominium unit owner’s first suit seeking injunctive relief against another unit owner and association because the amended complaint, which included allegations in a second, consolidated complaint seeking damages for negligence, related back. Anderson v. Epstein, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2211 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 28, 2016).

Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hallandale Open MRI, LLC

The circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity did not depart from the essential requirements of law by affirming a county court judgment for a medical provider in a personal injury protection (PIP) case because the Florida Supreme Court has accepted for review a conflict of decisions on the same issue of contractual interpretation.  Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hallandale Open MRI, LLC, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2208 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 28, 2016).

Helfrich v. City of Jacksonville

Trial court properly dismissed petition for declaratory relief concerning whether a city employee was entitled to a refund of both the contributions she made to the retirement fund and those the City made because she had not yet elected which option she was choosing and therefore there was no actual controversy.  Helfrich v. City of Jacksonville, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2253 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 4, 2016) (correcting opinion reported at 41 Fla. L. Weekly D902.)

Kilyn Construction, Inc. v. Pierce

Judge of Compensation Claims erred in granting claimant’s claim for additional housing benefits when he moved from a two-bedroom apartment to a four-bedroom home on basis the Employer/Carrier did not respond to his request for assistance and should on remand to make a determination as to whether any particular housing arrangement is reasonable and necessary.  Kilyn Construction, Inc. v. Pierce, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2251 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 4, 2016).