Florida Administrative Code Rule 11D-8.013 which sets out criteria to apply for a permit to conduct blood alcohol analyses does not constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority by failing to incorporate a process to indentify and/or exclude unreliable blood samples from the testing process. Goodman v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, 203 So.3d 909 (Fla. 4th DCA May 25, 2016).
Florida Administrative Code Rule 11D-8.012 governing the collection and storage of samples does not constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority by failing to establish standards for the method by which blood is collected for chemical analysis. Goodman v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1247 (Fla. 4th DCA May 25, 2016).
Trial court properly dismissed complaint against defendant cemeteries for misrepresenting and failing to bury plaintiff’s husband in accordance with “Jewish burial customs and traditions” because circuit court lacks subject matter jurisdiction per the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine rooted in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Mammon v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc., 193 So.3d 980 (Fla. 4th DCA May 25, 2016).
In Citrus Cancer case, appellate court held that plaintiffs were not required to pursue a claims bill in order to get paid, but that the issue of the constitutionality of sections 11.066(3) and (4), Florida Statutes as applied was premature because plaintiffs had pending a petition for writ of mandamus. Bogorff v. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 191 So.3d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA May 4, 2016).
Judgment debtor was entitled to homestead protection of article V, section 3(b) (3) of the Florida Constitution with regard to proceeds from voluntary sale of his homestead because they were deposited in a brokerage account designated as his “homestead account”—thus manifesting an intention to use the proceeds to purchase a new homestead—and because the Florida Constitution does not require “judgment debtors to place homestead proceeds in non-interest earning mediums only.” JBK Associates, Inc. v. Sill Bros., Inc., 191 So.3d 879(Fla. April 28, 2016).
The “mandatory fee schedule in section 440.34, which creates an irrebuttable presumption that precludes any consideration of whether the fee award is reasonable to compensate the attorney, is unconstitutional under both the Florida and United States Constitution as a violation of due process” per article I, section 9 of the Florida Constitution and Amendment XIV, section 1 of the United States Constitution. Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So.3d 431 (Fla. April 28, 2016).
Trial court erred by enjoining the application of an ad valorem tax exemption to a city’s marina because a city’s marina serves a “municipal or public purpose” per article VII, section 3(a) of the Florida Constitution. City of Fort Pierce v. Treasure Coast Marina, LC, 2016 WL 1660600 (Fla. 4th DCA April 27, 2016).