Luciano v. Adecco

Judge of Compensation Claims abused her discretion in admitting an attorney’s testimony relating to costs of surveillance, labor market research, and vocational expert services over hearsay objection because it was based only on entries without any “follow-up correspondence or bills indicating outstanding amounts owed.” Luciano v. Adecco, 194 So.3d 587 (Mem) (Fla. 1st DCA July 20, 2016).